What is behind a huge drop in the murder rate this year? The EU is concentrating first on cleaning its own house: collectively it constitutes the world’s second-largest economy.īut EU policymakers know that the reach and complexity of cyber businesses, especially the richest and most powerful among them, mean that successful regulation, and indeed the very future of the Internet, will likely hinge on the two other leading economic powers, China and America. The aim? To keep 21st-century technology tools from violating users’ privacy, safety, and other individual rights or from being used to undermine elections, democratic institutions, or communal and social trust. intelligence agencies.īut this was just the latest signal from the 27-nation European Union of its growing determination to take the lead in broader regulation of cyberspace. This week’s case was about privacy: the European Data Protection Board ruled that when it moved European users’ content to the United States, Facebook was failing to ensure it wouldn’t be shared with U.S. It is that cyberspace should have been regulated earlier. One lesson that governments have learned from their current efforts to regulate the Internet could yet encourage greater transatlantic cooperation. Europe’s new Digital Services Act obliges two-dozen very large players to provide an annual account on how they are combating disinformation, threats to safety, and election manipulation, among other ills. prefers to leave businesses to regulate themselves, the EU has less trust in them. But there is little sign of a common transatlantic approach to the issue. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Washington share many of Europe’s concerns about an uncontrolled, artificial intelligence-powered internet. But China is clearly not interested in joining such an international effort, which leaves the EU and United States. prefers voluntary action by businesses over Brussels’ legal prescriptions.Ĭyber businesses are global, which means rules and regulations should be too. Over the summer we’ll consider other reparations issues and locales.Building community is hard work, but it might be the fulcrum that lets us balance looking back and moving forward.Įurope is seeking a joint approach with Washington to regulate cyberspace, but the U.S. Treating people well comes with thinking of them that way.Having achieved this, the entire community experiences abundance, “like a spring of water, whose waters fail not.” It earns the name “repairer of the breach” and can “build the old waste places.”If today’s debate over reparations builds community, that sounds like progress to me, whatever decision is reached.Today’s issue, dedicated to reparations, looks at slavery, forced assimilation, and territorial dispossession – in the United States, Barbados, and Canada. And behind those good actions, Isaiah indicates, are good attitudes – compassion and humility. People feed the hungry, free the oppressed, undo heavy burdens. We have to move forward, somehow. To try to understand what might promote that, I turned to the world’s most-read book, the Bible. This phrase in Isaiah 58 piqued my interest: “repairer of the breach.”Here, the repairer isn’t a carpenter or mason but a caring community. That’s what researchers working with Saint Louis University are doing to learn about those enslaved by Jesuits at the school.Yet no amount of looking back can recompense historical harms. We can’t go back and undo the horrors of the middle passage or the sundering of families at slave auctions.What restoration is possible centuries later?A first step can be looking back and taking an honest accounting of the past. That’s where the hard work happens to restore, renew, make whole. But the shorter word it comes from – repair – strikes me as even bigger.As a noun, reparations suggests that a decision has been reached about concrete actions to redress past wrongs. As a verb, repair is a process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |